// EDITORIAL POLICY

Cybersecurity Content Policy

Last updated: June 2025

Cybersecurity reporting carries unique responsibilities. Poor coverage can mislead defenders, tip off attackers, expose victims, or undermine the trust between security researchers and the broader community. This policy sets out how Cyber Newsroom approaches these challenges.

Our goal is to be useful to security defenders and practitioners — not to create panic, enable threat actors, or embarrass victims. When in doubt, we err on the side of caution.

What We Cover

Cyber Newsroom focuses on cybersecurity content with clear relevance to practitioners:

What We Do Not Cover

Editorial Standards

// WE DO
  • Cite primary sources (NVD, vendor advisories, credible researchers)
  • Distinguish confirmed fact from analysis and speculation
  • Acknowledge uncertainty in attribution
  • Report CVSS scores and affected versions accurately
  • Include available mitigations and patches
  • Label AI-generated content clearly
  • Correct errors promptly and visibly
// WE DO NOT
  • Sensationalise threat severity beyond source material
  • Attribute attacks without corroborating evidence
  • Name individual victims without public confirmation
  • Republish ransom demands or stolen data
  • Speculate about unannounced vulnerabilities
  • Use scare language to inflate story importance
  • Present AI opinion as expert human opinion

Vulnerability Disclosure Coverage

We cover vulnerabilities once they are publicly disclosed — either by the vendor, the researcher, MITRE/NVD, or a CERT. We do not cover unpatched vulnerabilities that have not been publicly acknowledged, as premature publication could endanger systems before defences are available.

For zero-day disclosures already public (e.g., via PoC code or active exploitation reports), we cover the defensive posture: detection, containment, and workarounds. We do not provide reproduction steps or weaponisable technical detail beyond what is necessary for defenders.

Threat Actor Attribution

Cyber attribution is inherently difficult and frequently contested. Our policy:

Data Breach Reporting

What We Report

Breaches confirmed by: (a) the affected organisation, (b) regulatory notifications (SEC, ICO, DPC filings), (c) credible breach notification services with independent verification, or (d) law enforcement statements.

What We Omit

We do not publish: individual victim names from breach data, account credentials, payment card data, personally identifiable information (PII) of private individuals, or content sourced directly from dark web markets or ransomware leak sites.

Responsible Reporting on Active Incidents

During active incidents (ongoing ransomware, live exploitation), we:

Privacy in Security Reporting

Victims of cyber attacks — organisations and individuals — have privacy interests even when the attack is newsworthy. We:

Source Diversity & Independence

Our content aggregates from a curated list of sources including independent researchers, vendor threat intelligence teams, academic institutions, and specialist media. We maintain the following:

Corrections & Retractions

If a published article contains a material factual error, we will: